For want of a real national champion
Posted: Monday, December 19, 2011 by Travis Cody inI've explained in the past how much I disapprove of the current BCS process for determining what they call a college football national champion. To reiterate, I think it's stupid and decidedly unfair. There are 35 bowl games and according to the BCS, only one of them has any real meaning because the winner of that game is declared the champion of college football.
Stupid.
This year, of the 68 teams invited to play in bowl games and the 2 selected to play in the only meaningful game...
- 13 finished 6-6 overall with one at 6-7
- 15 finished at 7-5 overall
- 14 finished with losing conference records
Because there are 35 of them! Stupid.
There is even one game that features a 6-6 team with a losing record in its conference against a team that finished 6-7 because it lost its conference championship game.
Stupid, I say!
Why am I going on about this if it makes me so irritated? Because I do enjoy college football and I think it's long past time that the powers that be start rewarding the athletes and schools with a legitimate playoff system to determine a legitimate national champion. Every other level in football has a playoff system, from pee wee to the NFL.
So I made a reasonable system based on a set of criteria I determined to be important and to which I had easy access. I'm not a computer so my criteria had to be stats I could find for every team and keep track of relatively easily.
So what's my criteria? I'm glad you asked. I assigned points as follows:
- Wins = 20pts each
- This is obvious. Winning your games matters.
- Road win bonus = 5pts each
- Winning away from your own comfort and fans is important.
- Opponent winning record bonus = 10pts
- You have to play the schedule and you don't have any control over how good your opponents might be in any given year. But you should also get credit if your schedule ends up being tough. So 10pts to teams whose cumulative opponents result in winning records.
- Category bonus for top 20 finishes in passing yards, rushing yards, points for, and points against = 5pts each
- These particular categories summarize a team's proficiency on both offense and defense and does consider winning margin. That sometimes seems unsportsmanlike, but if a team's schedule is not as tough, it does call attention to how much better a team might be than its schedule might otherwise imply.
- Conference winner bonus = 15pts
- Because winning your conference matters.
- LSU (13-0, 8-0) from the SEC, 330pts
- Oklahoma State (11-1, 8-1) from the Big 12, 280pts
- Oregon (11-2, 8-1) from the Pac-12, 275pts
- Wisconsin (11-2, 6-2) from the Big Ten, 270pts
- Southern Miss (11-2, 6-2) from Conference USA, 265pts
- TCU (10-2, 7-0) from the Mountain West, 10pts
- Arkansas State (10-2, 8-0) from the Sun Belt, 245pts
- Northern Illinois (10-3, 7-1) from the MAC, 240pts
- Clemson (10-3, 6-2) from the ACC, 235pts
- Cincinnati (9-3, 5-2) from the Big East, 220pts
- Louisiana Tech (8-4, 6-1) from the WAC, 200pts
- Houston (12-1, 8-0) from Conference USA, 280pts - lost to Southern Miss in the conference championship game
- Boise State (11-1, 6-1) from the Mountain West, 275pts - lost to eventual conference champion TCU
- Alabama (11-1, 7-1) from the SEC, 270pts - lost to eventual conference champion LSU
- Virginia Tech (11-2, 7-1) from the ACC, 265pts - lost to eventual conference champion Clemson, once during the season and again in the conference championship game
- Stanford (11-1, 8-1) from the Pac-12, 250pts - lost to eventual conference champion Oregon
So after all the math, here's my bracket.
- #1 LSU vs #16 Louisiana Tech
- #8 Southern Miss vs #9 Virginia Tech
- #5 Boise State vs #12 Arkansas State
- #4 Oregon vs #13 Northern Illinois
- #2 Oklahoma State vs #15 Cincinnati
- #7 Alabama vs #10 TCU
- #6 Wisconsin vs #11 Stanford
- #3 Houston vs #14 Clemson
Maybe my proposal isn't perfect.
But can you say a system is better that sends Alabama to the BCS title game against LSU? Alabama didn't win its division and therefore didn't even play for its conference championship. Whereas Oklahoma State, which finished 2nd in my system for a #2 seed, won its conference but gets shut out of the BCS title game.
Stupid.
So what if those games were actually played in my tournament format? Who knows what could happen? I don't.
But I do think that the winner on New Year's day would be a real National Champion. And I'd watch my tournament. I won't watch any bowl games this season, and I will not watch the BCS title game.
In fact, I won't watch bowl games ever again. College football needs a playoff.
I'll just catch the parades. I never understood they don't do playoffs like they do with basketball...